Skip to content

ci: migrate x86 UT coverage to CloudSigma runners - #475

Open
Ariznawlll wants to merge 18 commits into
mainfrom
codex/coverage-cs-cutover
Open

Ariznawlll wants to merge 18 commits into
mainfrom
codex/coverage-cs-cutover

Conversation

@Ariznawlll

@Ariznawlll Ariznawlll commented Nov 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Scope

Split x86 UT Coverage into three complementary groups sharing the cs-large-7c14g runner pool. Each group selects its S3 configuration from the actual runner environment (MTY, MNL2, JED or RUH), uses a run/attempt/group-scoped prefix, and fails closed for unknown environments or missing configuration. Busy runners queue normally; distribution across environments is not guaranteed.

  • Keep normal PR-head checkout and the existing organization-member / safe-to-test trust gate.
  • Use GOMAXPROCS=7 and package parallelism 7 with the existing package/suite deadlines. No Actions module cache or builder-image cache is used.
  • Check restricted-account S3 initialization, basic and streaming writes; retain the agreed exclusion of real COS/OSS provider integration tests.
  • Check complete, disjoint same-source package evidence before merging all three profiles. Publish the combined profile using the existing ut-coverage-generation-...-attempt-... contract for the downstream BVT/coverage merge. Select matching latest group artifacts by run and attempt, including partial reruns.
  • Preserve per-group and combined skip evidence. Comparison against a baseline is an explicit validation step; automatic discovery of a current baseline is not implemented.

Evidence and remaining rollout checks

  • No-cache shared-pool experiment: success in 34m57s, 504 packages across MNL2/MNL2/MTY, S3 checks and combined profile passed, no failures/timeouts or new skip identities compared with the same-source baseline.
  • Earlier shared-pool experiment: success in 35m26s across MNL2/RUH/MTY; its module-cache restore missed. These are isolated experiments, not executions of the final production workflow.
  • JED shared-label probe passed. The historic RUH S3 timeout was not reproduced in a read-only probe, but its root cause and sustained reliability remain unverified.
  • Local: 26 routing, grouping, status/evidence selection and package-runner tests passed; Go profile-compactor tests passed; real three-group evidence was selected and validated locally (504 packages). A pre-existing process cleanup test returned Operation not permitted on local macOS; the Linux run below passed that test.
  • Linux workflow and contract checks passed for commit 58acbd4, including workflow validation, native runtime, S3 routing, three-group artifact selection and process cleanup tests.
  • Multi-PR concurrent capacity, JED full Coverage using the final shared-pool workflow, production caller integration and stable RUH S3 still require validation. Do not interpret a single successful isolated run as proof of production readiness. The PR does not change main or runner capacity.

@Ariznawlll
Ariznawlll marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2026 09:24
@Ariznawlll
Ariznawlll marked this pull request as draft November 11, 2026 20:07
@Ariznawlll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

已补充 CS S3 接入合约测试和 JED 内部 endpoint 部署说明(a414b3e)。CS 路径按 runner 环境选择对应 secret;受信任 PR 配置不全时明确失败;真实 COS/OSS 不注入 CS 日常 UT;强制核对 CS S3 basic 和 streaming_write 实际 pass。修复 secret-free local MinIO canary 仍错误要求云凭证的检查。本地 13 项 Python 测试和 actionlint 通过;最新 Linux 合约及隔离读写清理验证运行于 https://github.com/matrixorigin/matrixone/actions/runs/43149448772 。依赖 matrixorigin/matrixone#32590;真实 S3 配置和验证未完成,保持 draft,不切换 main 或现有正式测试。

@Ariznawlll
Ariznawlll marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2026 12:47

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant